The official web site of Julian Richards, archaeologist, broadcaster and writer
 
 
Email Me
Bookmark this Site
Follow Me on
Twitter
This site is best viewed in 1024 x 768 resolution.
Copyright Julian Richards.
 

The Stonehenge Landscape;
A Personal View

I suppose that I first visited Stonehenge some time in the early 1960’s when, as a family, we stopped off on our way down to Cornwall on holiday. There is a photograph of my Mum sitting on one of the fallen stones - those were the days when access was unhindered and anyone could experience the magic of being inside Stonehenge.


Map Showing the Stonehenge Environs
Move your mouse over the stars for pictures & comments
Map Copyright Wessex Archaeology

My next visit was in rather different circumstances, Midsummer, probably in 1974 with a party of friends from university. We went swimming at midnight near Chichester and reached Stonehenge in time for dawn in the middle of a huge crowd of hippies, Druids and police.

Then it got a bit more serious, more proper archaeological visits visits during the 1970’s before in 1980 I was asked if I would like to direct a Wessex Archaeology project to study the landscape surrounding Stonehenge. I remember being completely bowled over when I started to explore beyond Stonehenge, like so many visitors I had no real idea of what lay in the surrounding fields. Here was the most extraordinary collection of Neolithic and Bronze Age sites, not the ‘hard’ archaeology of Dartmoor or Orkney where everything was made of stone and had survived in some cases almost intact. With the exception of Stonehenge itself this was ‘soft’ archaeology, chalky mounds, ditches and banks, still visible after 4 or 5 thousand years. Just the barrows, the Bronze Age burial mounds, are enough to make this area worth visiting. Go to Winterbourne Stoke, this is like a barrow builders catalogue, every type of southern British barrow is there in one cemetery. But I mustn’t go on too much.

I ran the ‘Stonehenge Environs Project’ throughout the 1980’s, both in the field carrying out survey and excavation, and in the office, writing up the reports. I’ve stayed involved in Stonehenge ever since.

I have also been aware over the years, just how much the Stonehenge landscape has changed, slowly, almost imperceptibly, and yet today, when huge changes in roads and visitor facilities are being discussed yet again, most of what has gone before seems to be ignored. This is just a reminder of what the National Trust has done over the years.

The map, which is taken from a booklet called ‘Beyond Stonehenge’ that I wrote in 1985 shows the extent of the National Trust land holding around Stonehenge. Most of it had been commercially farmed chalkland, thin soils, big fields within which individual sites like round barrows sat as grassy humps, plus the odd bit of woodland. Some areas had been returned to permanent pasture in order to safeguard the archaeology, like the field to the north west of Stonehenge marked ‘Cursus Barrows’. Unfortunately this created the ideal campsite and for years this was the ‘Festival Field’ (see photo 1), home to thousands where Hawkwind played and where unfortunate incidents took place like the digging of latrine pits right between the barrows. Not the best place .

But there were other changes for the better. The Cursus is an extraordinary monument, a Neolithic enclosure defined by slight ditches and banks, but so big (over 2 km long) that getting any idea of its true size is very difficult. So the National Trust decided to clear a gap in Fargo Wood that coincided with the extent of the Cursus at its western end. This stopped the continuing rabbit damage to the small and fragile ditch and bank and gave some visual definition when looking from the eastern end.. We (the NT and I) also had the idea of restoring the western terminal, bulldozed flat after WW II. Excavations in the 1960’s had shown that the bank material lay on top of a old turf line that marked the point to which the ditch had silted up over the millennia and where grass had developed. All we had to do was remove the bulldozed bank material and put it back where it came from, simply turning the clock back about 40 years . This we did (see picture 2) , so you can now see the bank and shallow ditch at this end rather than a flat bit of grass protruding into a wheat field.

There were also great plans for doing something similar to the eastern end of the Cursus where a track runs along the length of what may be a long barrow and trees obscure the sight line to the western end. Fieldwork was done, plans were drawn up but sadly it never happened. It’s still a good idea though.

There were changes to the rest of the Cursus too. Fences that ran close to the ditch and bank were removed as they had become the focus for erosion by cattle’s hooves. Only one was retained, where the southern bank ran from about half way along to the eastern end and this was because there was no sign on the ground and the fence line provides a visual clue (Picture 3)

This removal of fences, to create the impression of more open uninterrupted areas of grassland, was carried out with great effect in the field marked ‘Avenue Field’ on the map. Here the old rectangular field pattern was done away with and new fences were created that run with the contours and are hidden in the shallow folds of a dry valley called Stonehenge Bottom. This may have been a subtle change but the effects were dramatic.

Not quite as dramatic as what happened to the King Barrows (on the ridge to the east of the Avenue Field. The area of derelict beech woodland just to the north of the A303 were bought by the National Trust in the mid 1980’s and there was immediately huge debate about what to do with the ancient trees, long past their sell by date, that stood on and around the huge Bronze Age burial mounds. Some people have a misconception about trees. They are living things that get old and die and have to be replaced. Old trees are wonderful but they don’t last for ever and the ones on the King Barrow Ridge were very old. Anyway, while the debate was still going on about whether to clear trees or not, nature intervened in the form of the great ‘Hurricane’ (the one that the weather men failed to predict). The result can be seen in photo 4. The majority of the trees were blown over and huge holes were torn in the barrow mounds by their great root balls. Fortunately the opportunity was taken to use these gashes to help understand the structure of the barrows (photo 5) and the area was then restored as an area of more open woodland.

Other bits of woodland have disappeared completely. Like the Hollow Plantation south of the A303, a modern rectangle of strips of fir trees that had no place in such a landscape.

So the Stonehenge Landscape has changed for the better over the last 20 years or so. The monuments are better looked after, mostly safer from ploughing and are better explained and more accessible. If you visit Stonehenge, take the trouble to walk out from the car park to the Cursus Barrows and beyond to the western end of the Cursus. If you’re feeling energetic and fancy a walk of an hour and a half or so then carry on down the length of the Cursus, back along the King Barrow Ridge and back partly down the line of the Avenue to the car park.

It’s a wonderful landscape that will hopefully get even better over the next few years.

Enjoy it.

Julian